Ingrid Fliter gives uneven recital for Portland Piano International

ingrid-fliterWhen a pianist places a score in the piano (on the inner frame) as sort of a security blanket for an important piano recital, I become suspicious and begin to wonder what might be wrong. That was a recurring theme running loose in my noggin during Ingrid Fliter’s concert on Sunday afternoon (April 5) at the Newmark Theatre as part of the Portland Piano International recital series. Fliter, the 2006 winner of the Gilmore Artist Award (with its $600,000 in monies) has established herself as one of the world’s preeminent pianists, but on Sunday afternoon she delivered a concert that was subpar for the most part.

The entire affair got off to good start with a nuanced performance of Bach’s “Italian Concerto” in F Major (BWV 971). Yet in the faster passages Fliter often would tap her shoes on the floor. She did turn a page on her Bach score, but didn’t seem to refer to it all that much.

After the Bach came a series of Chopin waltzes, six in all: the Waltz in C-sharp minor (Op. 64. No. 2), the “Grande Valse Brilliante” in A-flat Major (Op. 34, No 1), the Waltz in F minor (Op. posth.), the Waltz in A minor (Op. posth.), and the Grande Valse Brillante in E-flat Major (Op. 18). Fliter played these pieces very smoothly with a lot of control and very little flair. None of them stood out all that much and in the third waltz (the one in F minor), she seemed to have a lapse and replay a phrase.

For the second half of the program, Filter performed Schumann’s “Symphonic Etudes” in C-sharp minor (Op. 13). She showed a lot more freedom of expression in the first half of this long set of etudes and variations. The pieces had drama, but I wasn’t convinced of the overall arc of her interpretation. And again, in the midst of this complex work, and despite having the score in the piano, Fliter suffered a memory lapse that caused her to replay a phrase.

The finale was exuberant and grand, and the audience responded with loud applause, but they didn’t jump out of their seats. Fliter returned and gave two encores: a Schubert “Impromptu” and another Chopin waltz.

Overall, though, I wonder what may be bothering Fliter. I heard her a year ago with the Oregon Symphony, and she was superb (see my review here), but this recital seemed subpar.

Lintu, Gutiérrez, and Oregon Symphony deliver terrific concert of music by Mozart, Rachmaninoff, Lindberg, and Ravel

lintuGuest conductor Hannu Lintu and the Oregon Symphony presented an interesting concert that featured works by Mozart, Rachmaninoff, Lindberg, and Ravel on Saturday evening at the Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall. This appearance by Lintu marked the fourth time he has led the orchestra, and he again seemed to strike a harmonious chord with the orchestra. All in all, this program has something for everyone, and the audience responded to each piece enthusiastically.

The concert began with Mozart’s Symphony No 36 in C major, which is known as the Linz Symphony, because he composed this work while staying near that Austrian city. He wrote the entire work in five days between October 30th and November 4th, 1783 at the ripe age of 27, and it’s a work a pure beauty.

All of the strings, but especially the violins, played with a lot of precision and polish in this work. Led by concertmaster Jun Iwasaki, the entire ensemble conveyed lots of dynamic contrasts and made the music glow. Lintu used some unorthodox conducting techniques – like crossing both hands on the beat – to add his own stylistic stamp to the performance. All in all, this was a top-notch performance of Mozart and a pleasure to hear from beginning to end.

Guest pianist Horacio Gutiérrez collaborated with the orchestra to sweep the audience of its feet with a very fleet performance of Rachmaninoff’s “Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini.” It seemed to me that Gutiérrez rushed things a bit here and there and sacrificed some of the emotion of the piece for the sake of speed. But with some terrific assistance from the orchestra, the piece sparkled and the audience responded with a big burst of applause after the final variation concluded with a twinkle.

Before playing Magnus Linberg’s “Feria,” Lintu said a few words about the composition, which was composed in 1997. He explained that this piece doesn’t have any stated movements, but can be understood as having five sections. The first section serves as an introduction to the piece, the second shows off some of the string players before the rest of the orchestra joins in, the third section has big slow chords, and a trumpet solo – which quotes Monteverdi – occurs before the fourth section, which is a concerto grosso. In the fifth section everyone in the orchestra plays at full tilt and “we’ll see which part of the orchestra wins.”

I liked the bright and quick sounds from the trumpets and brass section at the beginning of the piece. This musical urgency was matched at times by furious playing from other sections of the orchestra, and I recall that the violins ignited some of the festivities. After a lot of sonic business, things gradually calmed down, and that exposed some very closely threaded tones in the brass section. I like the way that principal trombonist Aaron LaVere used a mute to make a brief wail that punctuated that passage. I recall a wild solo for concertmaster Iwasaki, fluttering woodwinds, and piano notes that randomly seemed to be sprinkled on top of it all. Everything seemed to end in a loud conflagration of sound that perhaps signaled an end to the festival (“feria”).

Before motioning for the entire orchestra to stand, Lintu directed applause to pianist Carol Rich, and that became one of the first time that I’ve ever seen a conductor recognize the orchestra’s pianist for special commendation. I think that Rich turned several shades of red, and that made the evening that much more special.

The concert concluded with Ravel’s “Bolero.” I haven’t heard this piece played in a concert for many years; so it was very refreshing to hear the orchestra and Lintu perform it. Lintu used very small hand gestures without a baton to shape the first section, and then gradually built the rest of the piece with larger gestures and finally he reached for his baton to signal the big, splashing ending. I loved the way that the orchestra played this work. There were so many finely-wrought solos by many members that the list of names would be rather long. Suffice it to say that members of the woodwinds and the brass really stood out, and LaVere once again was terrific on the trombone. Thunderous applause and a standing ovation greeted the players at the glorious finale, and everyone left the concert hall in a happy mood.

Join the Gathering Note Twitter feed for a chance to win

image003

Join The Gathering Note Twitter feed by clicking here and you will be entered for the chance to win two tickets to hear acclaimed pianist Leon Fleisher play a recital in Tacoma, WA on 04/19/2009 at the Pantages Theater and Fleisher’s new recording of Mozart piano concertos on Sony.  The recital is part of the Tacoma Philharmonic’s 2008/2009 season.  You can learn more about the recital and the Tacoma Philharmonic here.  Fleisher’s new Mozart disk is the first two-hand concerto album the pianist has recorded in forty years.

You can also join Twitter by clicking “Follow” on the widget in the right hand column of the page.

Twitter is a free micro-blogging service where users can receive updates through RSS (subscription feed), SMS (text messages on your cell phone), or by reading them at Twitter.

Only people currently following The Gathering Note and those who sign up before April 15 are eligible to win this Fleisher package.

Two Concertos Are the Focus of the Seattle Symphony Concert

It is a rare night for a symphony concert to host two concertos, and Thursday night at Benaroya Hall was a rare night.

The unfamiliar work was Sam Jones’ Trombone Concerto, “Vita Accademia,” and the familiar, Brahms’ Violin Concerto, both given stellar performances by Ko-ichiro Yamamato, SSO principal trombone, and violinist Vadim Repin.

Jones, composer-in-residence at the Seattle Symphony since 1997, is no stranger to writing for brass instruments. The trombone concerto is his third, the first being for tuba and the second, French horn. He has a gift for bringing out the virtuosity of each instrument, their tonal qualities and  dramatic breadth. His tuba concerto was astonishing for what it asked the soloist to accomplish. Who would haver thought a tuba, even in the right hands, could move so fast and sound so convincing in lyrical passages? The trombone concerto was perhaps not quite so surprising because we know the instrument better, but still, one marveled at its dynamic range and beauty of tone.

The composer did not just fashion a set of exercises to demonstrate the many lives of the trombone but created a real concerto, with all sorts of interests. Its bits of contrived collegiate nostalgia must have put a smile on many peoples’ faces. The subtitle, “Vita Accademia,” is quite justified. The work’s wit was the leavening agent for the passagework which could be heard throughout the piece, as well as its full-blooded romanticism. The work is one of his most persuasive. His duet for trombone and tuba was especially effective.

A major factor in the concerto’s success was Yamamoto, one of the symphony’s most respected figures. One does not normally hear the full range of an orchestra’s principal trombonist’s abilities. This concerto was a first-class opportunity to do so. Yamamoto did not disappoint. He has a big technique, seemingly capable of doing anything, but certainly anything Jones put before him, which was considerable. He swam through those treacherous waters with enormous confidence, no doubt justified by a lot of work. Yamamoto possesses a big, generous tone and a dramatic sensibility. He can also turn a phrase eloquently and vividly.

Repin’s assignment was wholly different: to bring a great work of art, ubiquitous to say the least, to life once again, to give it perhaps a fresh viewpoint. The Siberian violinist began his brilliant career very early — winning the gold medal at the Wienawski Competition at the age of 11. He has not stopped since then. He made his Seattle debut about a decade later at the Seattle International Music Festival where his technical and musical abilities were a revelation. All young virtuosos today have fingers; otherwise they would not be on any major concert platform. However, Repin seems to go one step further with his bravura and bravado. Not only does he play every note but every note accurately and with clarity,. The effect was often electrifying Thursday night at Benaroya. A mere technician he is not. He molds everything he does — fast and slow, soft and loud — into something musically coherent and provocative, Little is simply played as just notes: Repin makes every phrase count and come to life,  sometimes in an amazingly muscular way — really theatrically in the best sense of the word —  and sometimes softly lyrical. He can romance the music with a tone that is sweet but never cloying and always penetrating. Undoubtedly his 1736 Von Szerdahely Guarneri del Gesu violin makes a significant contribution.

Not surprisingly, Gerard Schwarz held everything together skillfully from the podium and with empathy for the soloists.

The evening began with David Diamond’s “Rounds.” There was a time when the Seattle Symphony heard a lot of David Diamond — too much. “Rounds” is one of his better pieces, even if it runs on too long. The strings played in a splendid fashion.

Drums Along the Pacific: Strange, Beautiful Music

lou-and-cage-small

In the late 1930’s two young composers – Lou Harrison and John Cage –  found themselves teaching at Seattle’s Cornish College of the Arts.  It is doubtful many people knew who these twenty-something composers were.  Neither stayed in Seattle long, but during their stay, each pioneered new instruments, systems of notation, and sounds.  Last Thursday through Sunday, Cornish brought Harrison and Cage’s music to the forefront through the college’s Drums Along the Pacific festival.  The festival commemorated the 70th anniversary of a series of percussion concerts lead by Cage and Harrison that their mentor Henry Cowell dubbed “drums along the Pacific.”   In the process, musicians from around Washington and the country gave a convincing argument for the seldom heard music of two pioneering American composers.

Festival events were spread out over four days.  The first night devoted to Cage and Harrison’s mentor Henry Cowell.  The Seattle Chamber Players and the Pacific Rims Percussion Quartet handled a selection of Lou Harrison’s music, including his ebullient Concerto in Slendro.  The focus of the entire festival, however, was Saturday.  Beginning early in the afternoon combinations of musicians came together and played four hours of John Cage’s music – encompassing his entire output.  This four hour marathon, interrupted only by a brief dinner break, is probably the first (and maybe the last) time so much Cage was played live in Seattle.  The fourth day, presented Gamelan music by Cage and Harrison.

Of the two composers, Lou Harrison is the easiest on the ears.  Like Cage, Harrison dabbled in sound, just not as much.  The pieces on Friday night showed this experimentation.  Double Music is a product of both Cage and Harrison and is played on “found” instruments that included brake drums, thunder sheers, and tam tams to name a few.  In May Rain the prepared piano and percussion played a supporting role to baritone John Duykers.  Of course, Harrison’s “tack piano” is used in the Concerto for Slendro.  Violinist Mikhail Shmidt led two tack pianos, celesta, and an assortment of percussion in a vigorous performance that sounded larger on stage than the assembled musicians.

The new sounds produced by these instruments were never overwhelming.  Their sounds were punctuated and precise and fit well with the constant rhythmic pluck, push, and pull of Harrison’s music. It is in rhythmic invention where Harrison really excels.  Unfortunately, his music doesn’t do much more.  Perhaps that is why Lou Harrison is easier to hear than John Cage and why by the end of the night Harrison’s cascading rhythms seemed pat.

The same was not true for the next night – the Cage marathon.  We know John Cage because of his experimentation with noise as music and chance in music.  Flipping coins, found objects, and of course, the prepared piano are all associated with Cage. Less so, are Cage’s works for more traditional sounds and instruments.  The pieces chosen for the Cage marathon encompassed the composer’s entire output and balanced what is common knowledge about the composer with what is not.

I was surprised by a number of pieces over the course of the evening.  The Seasons, a piece for piano played by Cage expert Stephen Drury, teemed with tangible life even though the piano is so ordinary compared to some of the other instruments being used.  Imaginary Landscape 2 was a clattering good time.  Who knew the conch shell is played by blowing into it?  Third Construction was just as fun.  Except, twenty seconds into the piece one of the percussionists stopped and announced his cans (literally empty coffee cans turned upside down were out of order).  He switched a few around and started playing again.  The audience had a nice chuckle.  A few days later, when I explained what happened to a friend, he responded, that maybe the mistake and the interruption were intentional?  If it was intentional, the Pacific Rims Percussion Quartet played it well.  Two pieces for closed piano and voice –  A Flower and The Wonderful Widow of Eighteen Springs –  made me reassess how I think of the piano as an instrument.  Finally, Root of an Unfocus for prepared piano, stirred so many new sounds out of the instrument I was rapt.

If I were generalizing John Cage’s output, I would say his best music is music where instruments and notation are out of the ordinary.  Crumpled paper and tin cans.  Chance run amok with the help of clearly defined parameters for the musicians.

John Cage and Lou Harrison are not everyone’s cup of tea.  In fact, I would guess very few people prefer the sweet bitterness that is Cage’s music.  But, last weekend’s Cowell, Harrison, Cage festival – Drums Along the Pacific – exhibited the best and worst of these composers.  The performances were exceptional, from some of the leading advocates of this music in the country, and the experience unforgettable.  I have been told the festival organizers are maneuvering to take some or all of the festival on the road, replicating the original Drums Along the Pacific concert tour.  If that happens, Seattle would be lucky to get a repeat performance of this beautifully strange music.

You can read a replay of the The Gathering Note’s live blog of the John Cage marathon portion of the festival here.